Sunday, October 30, 2016
photos 9: rhythm
The rhythm in this photo is tonal, as it moves in a sort of gradient from left to right, from the shadow in the barn window to the mid-tone of the red barn to the light and bright sky. It also functions as rhythmic because the eye is moving back and forth along the gradient, and the shapes in the photo are geometric, also serving to lead the eye around the barn in particular.
The rhythm in this photo is created by the very obvious pattern of the subject. On the Icee machine are three flavors, and more specifically three colors, that are all shaped the same but create a tonal progression. Even the little reflections of lights between the flavor names and pumps create a pattern. I wish I had framed it a bit differently, so the words above the flavor names weren't visible - they're kind of distracting.
The rhythm here is pretty obvious, as there's a clear pattern being created by all the cameras and lenses. It's pretty monochromatic so the tonal separation is created by shadows and different-colored parts of the cameras. I also like the lines that the shelves create, to guide the eye, and they blend in nicely with the brick wall on the left side of the photo.
Thursday, October 27, 2016
one-shot of an event: beat list
NAME: Brenna
Empey
DATE:
10/22/2016
PROJECT #3 BEAT LIST
After
writing your Director's Statement of Intent, but before shooting, create
a Beat List for your One Take film. Like a shot list, the Beat List will
include the moments you are hoping to capture in your one take. To create the
Beat List, do the following:
1.
Visualize the event unfolding in your mind as you answer these questions:
a) Where is the action
taking place? How will we know that?
It will be taking place in a basement apartment. We’ll
know because I plan to start filming the subjects outside, so we’ll see what
type of place they’re entering.
b) How will the action
unfold? In other words, what are "beats" of the action?
The beats in this scene won’t be communicated by
movement, but rather by emotion on my subjects’ faces. This might make it
tricky as a film but I think starting outside the house will really help. In a
perfect world, my two subjects will discuss the prospect of getting their palms
read before entering. The palm reader and the subjects will then introduce
themselves, and we’ll sit down, and begin the palm reading. Then the beats will
be emotional as the subjects receive information from the palm reader and react
to it.
c) Who is involved in this
event?
A palm reader and two people getting their palms read.
d) Where is the drama in
the event? Is it between competitors? Are there spectators? Is there some kind
of physical risk?
The drama is with the subjects. I’ve made sure
that my subjects are two people, who have never had their palm read before, so
hopefully their reactions will communicate the emotions they’re going through
as the palm reader gets things right about who they are, their past, etc. There
will be at least one spectator and possibly more – but for sure it’ll be the
other person waiting to get their palm read, or the other person who just got
their palm read. There is no physical risk with filming a palm reading,
thankfully!
2.
Decide how you will communicate the above information to the audience in terms
of beats or points of focus. In other words, what specific images/subjects
does the audience need to see to:
a) understand what's
happening;
I need to get an
establishing shot of the apartment, I think, or at least an establishing shot
of where we are inside the apartment,
whether that will be a bedroom or the living room or wherever. I also need to
make sure I get a shot of the palm reading book that my palm reader will be
using, and definitely some coverage of the plants and incense she has in her
house.
b) connect with the people
involved;
A lot of my coverage will
be of people’s faces, because I really want to capture my two subjects reacting
to what the palm reader is telling them. I’m also going to get coverage of the
palm reader reading from her book and really studying the palm, so we
understand that she’s serious and not a fraud.
c) grasp, and feel,
the drama.
Palm reading is all about
feeling, so I need to make sure I’m getting tight shots of details. I want
tight shots of faces (the palm reader and subjects), and tight shots of their
hands during the reading process. Eyes are the windows to the soul, where we’ll
see the most emotion in the subjects’ reactions, so I think I’ll need to spend
a lot of time on their faces.
3.
Decide where the camera will need to move in order to capture these images.
The
camera will follow behind the subjects as they enter the apartment, and look
around the apartment a bit to establish the space. When they sit down to have
their palms read, that’s when I’ll get all my tight shots and really move in to
capture close-ups of faces and eyes. The palm reader and the subject will be
sitting across from one another, so I’ll mostly be capturing them in profile,
but will be panning from one face to another a lot of the time. This includes
tilting down to the palm being read, so I’ll be moving in a triangle a lot.
I’ll also widen out to diversify the shots and get a two-shot of the palm
reader and subject.
4.
Create a list of the above beats and images in the order you think they will
occur. (Don't move past each beat too quickly--give the audience time to
process the information!) For each beat/image, include this information:
a) The subject of the beat
(what/who are we looking at?)
b) The why. Why is each
beat important? What is the purpose of the shot in terms of
story, drama, character? What impact will it have on the viewer?
c)
Include: 1) The
type of shot (W, M, CU, ECU, etc.); 2) the angle and type (High, Low, OTS, POV,
etc.); 3) any visual element(s) you'd like to take advantage of in the
location (Flat or Deep Space, Horizontal/Vertical/Diagonal Line, Warm or Cool
colors, etc.) However, remember that you are not to manipulate this event
by giving direction, assigning wardrobe, production designing, etc..
·
Waiting
to enter the apartment
a)
The
subject of the beat is the two people who are going to have their palms read.
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to show the anticipation of the people about to get
their palm read. I hope they’ll talk about how they’ve never done this before
and how they feel about it or what they’re expecting.
c)
This
shot will be W and OTS on our subjects, warm colors because the sun will
hopefully be setting when we film, and deep space because you can see all the
way to the back of the apartment from the front door.
·
Meeting
the palm reader
a)
The
subject of the beat is the palm reader
b)
The
purpose of this beat is show both the subjects and the audience the normalcy of
this person, who they might not have expected to be so normal.
c)
This
shot will be W three-shot on subjects and palm reader, warm colors because of
the sunset, and flat space because I’ll back out from the doorway into a
cramped stairwell that will make it flatter.
·
Entering
the apartment
a)
The
subject of the beat is the apartment/what’s inside it
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to let the anticipation of both the subjects and the
audience grow, because now we’re entering a new space, where we don’t know what
is going to happen.
c)
This
shot will be MED OTS, warm colors because the sunset will be coming in from the
window (although this may be hard to do because the walls inside the apartment
are white, and the furniture is black), and deep space because we’re moving
into the apartment.
·
Palm
reader and subject sit down/get ready
a)
The
subject of the beat is the palm reader and first person who’s going to get
their palm read
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to show that it takes some prep before reading someone’s
palm. I’m hoping that the palm reader will explain a couple things to the
subject before she begins reading, and I hope I can get a shot of her palm
reading book to bring the audience in on what’s happening.
c)
This
shot will be W two-shot, warm colors, because now we’ll be able to see the
warm-colored tapestry and warm-colored coffee table that the palm reader has in
her apartment, and flat space because now I’ll be focusing on the small living
room where the palm reading will happen.
·
Subject
reacts to palm reading
a)
The
subject of the beat is the person getting their palm read and their palm
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to show how the subject is feeling about this thing
they’ve never experienced before, and may not even believe in. In my experience
palm readings are pretty accurate, so I’m hoping there will be feelings of
surprise and disbelief on the subject’s face.
c)
This
shot will be MED on the person getting their palm read, warm colors, flat space
because the living room is so small and I want to focus on the subject’s face
anyway.
·
Subject
reacts to finger reading
a)
The
subject of the beat is the person getting their palm read and their fingers
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to continue the previous beat, but now the palm reader
is reading a new part of the hand. In a perfect world, this beat would be more
of the subject’s authentic reactions to what the palm reader is telling them.
c)
This
shot will be MED-W so I can see both the face of the subject and their hand,
warm colors, flat or deep space depending on where they’re sitting in the room
because there’s more space off to one side of the couch than the other.
·
Palm
reader answers the subject’s questions
a)
The
subject of the beat is the palm reader
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to show that the palm reader isn’t just here to mystify
my subjects, but also to legitimize her practice of palm reading by being
generous and willing to explain. It’s fun for a palm reader to the reactions of
her subjects, too, and I want to capture some of that in her face.
c)
This
shot will be MCU, moving back in on the palm reader this time, warm colors, flat
space.
·
Palm
reading ends and subject reflects
a)
The
subject of the beat is the palm reader and the person who got their palm read
b)
The
purpose of this beat is to bring conclusion to what we just saw and allow a
moment for the subject to talk to the palm reader in reflection.
c)
This
shot will be MCU to W as I move out to capture the whole image of them discussing
the palm reading, warm colors because of the light coming in from the window,
and flat-to-deep space.
Wednesday, October 26, 2016
one-shot of an event: director's statement
Director/DP: Brenna Empey
FILM 4 DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT
What is the story of this scene in two or three sentences? In other words, what happens in the scene?
Two people will have their palms read by a palm reader. It’s
their first time doing something like this, so they don’t know what to expect.
What is the purpose of this scene in the larger story? (Or, if there is not a larger story, invent the purpose of this scene.)
What is the purpose of this scene in the larger story? (Or, if there is not a larger story, invent the purpose of this scene.)
There isn’t really a larger story beyond what is happening,
but I’d like to think that my subjects are curious to learn who they are from another
person, someone who can tell them things about themselves just by looking at
their hands. Maybe they’ve come to a palm reader as a last hope as they try to
get some answers about their lives.
What is the emotion I want to communicate?
What is the emotion I want to communicate?
I want to communicate unpredictability and surprise, because
there will probably be a big difference between what the subjects want to hear and the truth of what the
palm reader will tell them.
Why is this scene personal to me? What previous personal experiences does it remind me of? Why do I need to make this scene?
Why is this scene personal to me? What previous personal experiences does it remind me of? Why do I need to make this scene?
I don’t really know myself and I’m kind of fascinated when
other people tell me things about myself. It could be things I already know but
didn’t realize, or it could be things that I had no awareness of at all. Palm
reading is one of those instances where I feel like I’m learning things about
myself and realizing some repressed things about who I am.
What, specifically, must the audience understand narratively and feel at the end of this scene? How do you intend to make sure this will happen?
What, specifically, must the audience understand narratively and feel at the end of this scene? How do you intend to make sure this will happen?
I want the audience to feel like the subjects have learned
unknown things about themselves. It’ll really help that this is the subjects’
first time getting their palm read, which means they’ll probably be pretty
reactive to things the palm reader is telling them. In particular, I hope I’ll
get some authentic reactions to negative things that the subjects are hearing
about themselves, maybe things they would never admit to.
What two visual elements (line, shape, space, tone, color, rhythm, movement) will you use to help communicate the emotion of the scene?
What two visual elements (line, shape, space, tone, color, rhythm, movement) will you use to help communicate the emotion of the scene?
I’m going to use color and rhythm in the limited space of
the small apartment to communicate the atmosphere of the scene. There’s a big
tapestry and an incense burner in the apartment, which are both colorful and
will help set the mood. Rhythm will mostly be attributed to camera movement as
I move from palm reader, to hands, to subject and back again. I’m going to keep
it rhythmic so it doesn’t seem sporadic.
What are some potential obstacles in creating a successful scene? How can you be prepared to overcome these?
What are some potential obstacles in creating a successful scene? How can you be prepared to overcome these?
Honestly, I’m just afraid that the scene won’t be
interesting enough. My beats are dependent on emotion (the subjects reacting to
things the palm reader is telling them), and I don’t know if that’ll be enough
to keep the audience engaged. Thankfully I have two subjects, so if one of them
isn’t very reactive, hopefully the other one will be.
Saturday, October 22, 2016
shot for shot: director's reflection
NAME: Brenna
Empey
DATE: 10/18/2016
FILM: Shot-for-Shot
DP: Jase Van
Meeteren
TMA 285 DIRECTOR’S REFLECTION
Overall response (2-3 paragraphs):
In 2-3 paragraphs, write an overall response to
your film: Were you successful at achieving what you set out to achieve? What
are you proud of? What would you do differently if you could remake this piece?
What did you learn?
As
I was thinking about what to do for my shot-for-shot, Blade Runner was one of the top choices but there was just one
problem – it’s science fiction and very heavy on the production design end of
things. I settled on this scene even though Deckard’s apartment is the type of
place that wouldn’t exist in Provo, Utah, and just as I expected, finding a
location was difficult. I think this negatively affected the piece, not in the
sense that it didn’t look good, but in the sense that making the space work ate
up a lot of my attention and time on the actual shooting day. I wish I had
gotten to spend more time talking to my actors, and maybe more time for takes,
rather than spending a lot on trying to imitate the space in Blade Runner.
I
do like how Rachel and Danny’s performances ended up, even though some people
in class said Danny’s performance was a little flat. The cinematography turned
out really well with our limited lighting options. If I were to do this scene
again, I would spend more time with colors and costumes within the set itself, as
well as in coloring, because my recreation ended up being too warm, lacking the
industrial feel of the original movie. I might also cast someone else to play
Harrison Ford’s character Deckard, not because I didn’t like my actor’s
performance, but because I think Harrison Ford’s physicality is very different from
that of my actor’s. I learned that casting the right body and face shapes are
important even to the point that they can affect framing and mood.
Briefly answer the following:
What, specifically, did you want to communicate? Were you
successful? Why? Why not?
I
just wanted to recreate the general feelings of this emotionally-heightened
scene, which are gradual defeat on Rachael’s end, and a range of shifting
emotions on Deckard’s end. This is a difficult discussion for both characters,
and I really wanted to draw that difficulty out of my actors. It was very
different than previous assignments to come into this scene having a
pre-written script and basically a pre-written shot list, but that didn’t make
it any less of a challenge. I think, for my actors’ capabilities, I was
successful in pulling out the emotions I wanted even though they may not be as
conspicuous as in Harrison Ford and Sean Young’s performances in the original
film.
How, specifically, did you try to say this? What visual elements, techniques, etc. did you
use?
The
low, contrasty lighting of this scene really communicates a feeling of loss,
hopelessness, and frustration. Deckard’s dialogue dominates this scene, and
Danny (my actor) and I talked a lot about why this character acts the way he does.
We concluded that he kind of just wants the conversation to be over with, like
it’s an annoyance, but it ends with Deckard having a shift in mood as he tries
to be more sympathetic to Rachael. For Rachael, Deckard’s words are
devastating. That’s why the high-contrast lighting works so well, and we tried
to recreate that as best we could in the recreation. Favoring the shadowed side
of the characters’ faces let us take a peek into their psyche and see that this
conversation is difficult for both of them, but in different ways.
What did you learn about storytelling:
I
really learned about how detail can affect the entire mood of a scene when I
was doing this assignment. As I was trying to somewhat recreate the messiness
in Deckard’s apartment, as well as the textures and colors, I realized that my
recreation wouldn’t have the same poignancy because I couldn’t include all the
details. There are vodka bottles all over Deckard’s apartment, which I didn’t
have. The harsh textured light from the blinds on the windows adds a lot to the
industrial, futuristic feel of the scene, and we had trouble recreating those
with the same punch. All around, my scene ended up being much softer and
homier, whereas the details in production design in the original scene make it
very dystopian and industrial.
Working with actors and getting performance:
I
talked about this a bit already, but how I went about this scene was simply by
asking my actors how and why they think the characters were acting in this way
in this moment. It was an interesting process because I showed them the
original scene from Blade Runner before
we began shooting my recreation, so it was more like analyzing an
already-existing portrayal of emotions rather than just reading lines and
letting my actors come up with their own interpretations. We talked a lot about
what Deckard and Rachael were feeling and why, and how they were reacting to
their situation. I think my actors also had different strengths – Danny, who
played Deckard, was great at taking Deckard’s emotions and portraying them in
his own way. Rachel, who played Rachael, did a great job at imitating Sean
Young’s inflexion and facial expressions.
Blocking — camera
and actors:
I
was actually surprised when this didn’t come up during the screening of my
recreation in class. Blocking seemed generally pretty easy at first – the two
characters remain in their own spaces on opposite sides of the room – but I was
really struggling with eye-lines when we were shooting. I think it’s because of
two things: I messed up the blocking a bit, and the room in the original Blade Runner is a lot bigger than the
space I was filming, and therefore there was less space in which the characters
could exist. Because of this, eyelines were less extreme than I wanted them to
be, and my characters were facing the camera more than they should have been.
For the most part, though, the eyelines made sense for the space I was working
in, even if they weren’t exactly the same as in the original scene.
Visuals — composition,
framing, visual elements:
This
is the one area in which I really thought I would shine, but when I got into
the editing room I realized a couple shots of Deckard were too tight! Most
shots of Rachael were spot on, and the lines on Rachael’s end of the room were
very similar to the lines in the original scene, so her shots looked pretty
good. We had to manipulate the structure of the room on Deckard’s end, though,
and basically create a wall where there wasn’t one, so the lines didn’t work as
well and we had less space to work with. In the shots of him sitting down on
the couch, we should’ve backed up or gone onto a wider lens.
Design & Art Direction:
I
talked about this a lot already but it was very difficult finding a suitable
location and recreating Deckard’s apartment. It took a lot of time out of our
shoot, and a lot of manpower that I wasn’t expecting. I don’t have much
experience in production design, which is why (unfortunately) a lot of my
assignments in this class haven’t been art-inclined. I’m really glad I found
this location, though, because the cubic design of the fireplace behind Rachael
is a great recreation of the walls of Deckard’s apartment. To create the same
sort of geometric shapes on Deckard’s side of the room, I laid a bookshelf
sideways across a desk and filled it with books, and I think that helped the
geometric feel of his side of the room. I wish we could’ve found a place with
such stylized walls as they have in Blade
Runner.
The Production Process — collaboration with crew, the logistics of making this piece:
Getting
ready for this shoot was, in general, pretty smooth sailing. The only hiccups
were that my original actress dropped out a week before the shoot and I had to
rush to find another one, and I had a bit of trouble finding a suitable
location because Blade Runner is full
of stylized science fiction spaces. The actual shooting of the scene was pretty
easy, though. I really trust Jase as a DP which took a lot of stress out of how
the lighting, framing, and camera movement would look in comparison to the
original scene. Danny and Rachel both delivered satisfying performances after
we discussed their characters’ feelings, motivations, and actions.
What was it like to watch your
film with an audience? Did they understand it? Miss the point? Why did they
respond the way they did?
I
was happily surprised that most of the audience seemed to like the location a
lot, because I was worried about how inaccurate it was compared to the original
scene. The audience did help me realize that my recreation came off as too
homey and warm, almost the exact opposite of the cold industrial nature of the
original. What I found most interesting was people’s reactions to Danny’s
performance – it read as flat and uninteresting to some people, while others
really liked it. I personally thought Danny did a great job as Deckard but
presenting his performance to an audience made me recognize reasons why it came
off as lacking in emotion that I hadn’t recognized before. I think the general
response to the warmer feeling of my recreation is totally justified, and I
should’ve paid more attention to my colors while shooting and in post.
photos 8: sense of movement
This photo creates a sense of movement with eye-line. The girl closest to the camera is making eye contact with us but her body is turned away, almost as if she's getting ready to join with the other people in the photo - they're all looking at something off to the right. We caught her in the middle of a movement, and she pauses to acknowledge the viewer. The direction that the other people are looking makes the viewer wonder what could possibly be going on out-of-frame as well, keeping our eye constantly moving to the right.
This photo creates a sense of movement with lines. The road receding off into the background is one thing, but the texture of the bridge is arguably even more interesting. The separate slats are going int he same direction as the road, but there are lots of them, giving that area of the photo a more staccato rhythm than the rest. The bridge also looks like a sort of gateway, drawing the eye into the photo and to the end of the street where it eventually stops. The movement is very one-dimensional, but moves very deep into the photo.
This photo creates a sense of movement with shape. These flowers typically stand upright when there isn't any wind, but just looking at the shape of the flowers here gives the impression that they're moving. They're all being swung to the right by the wind, reaching up into the top right corner of frame. I'm not sure I like the blurry flower in the foreground, but it's the one with the most interesting shape, so that's a happy accident I suppose. The contrast of the white flowers against the greenery also helps lead the eye from one flower to the next.
Monday, October 17, 2016
Saturday, October 15, 2016
photos 7: color
Red and green are on opposite sides of the color wheel - complementary colors. Here, the two of them work nicely to draw the eye from the top of the sign to the bottom. The gradient blue of the sky behind the sign almost looks fake but has a similar effect in leading the eye from top to bottom, from darker blue to lighter blue. It gets only more interesting with the stark white and black contrasting every other color in this photo. I also think the lines are interesting, and provide the image with a sort of frame-within-a-frame.
This photo is interesting to me because it's generally dull and de-saturated until you look at the red lines on the vaporizer. There's also affinity of color between the blue on the bottom part of the vaporizer and the jeans - altogether, the splashes of color in this photo form a sort of triangulation of interest for the eye to follow. The first thing I see in this photo is the red, then the blue of the vaporizer, then the blue jeans, then the tattoo of the bird that stands out against the subject's skin - a triangle of things for the eye to look at. It also helps simplify the photo, the fact that all the most prominent colors are primary.
I love this photo for many of the same reasons as my second photo - it's a saturated subject in a generally de-saturated world. The most prominent colors, obviously, are the red of this girl's jacket and the red of the striped blanket next to her. The eye never really leaves those two places. I wish, either with colors or tone, that her face stood out more from the background. I do like that, by accident, the blanket ended up being on the same side of the couch that she was facing, almost as if she's turning away from the dullness of her surroundings.
Sunday, October 9, 2016
photos 6: tone
The lines in this photo are really what make it interesting. On the left half of the frame especially, there are three distinct leading lines that draw the eye to the darkness in the back right third of the photo - the silhouette of the mountain in the background, the line of light from passing cars, and the shadow of the edge of the road. All of them work well here to guide the viewer around the photo, especially because one of those lines is tonally the brightest thing in the photo (the line of passing cars). The brake lights cause a sort of tonal gradient from the bottom of the photo to the top, with the trees and road gradually getting darker and darker as the eye follows those three lines into the pitch-black area in the top right.
This photo was actually an accident, but I ended up loving the way it's lit (brake lights on the left; headlights on the right, the moon as a backlight) because of how it controls the tone of each tree. It's also full of consistently vertical lines which make it interesting, especially since the verticals are all different textures and thicknesses. The structure of this photo, then, is offset by the silhouette of the sloping mountain in the background, and the circular glow of the moon. Both are on opposite ends of the tonal spectrum; very dark, and very bright. The trees all fall somewhere in between, with the strikingly white tree on the right third being the tonal medium between the mountain and the moon.
If there's anything I really love, it's frames within frames. Shape-wise, this photo is pretty cool because there's so much going on. The line between the patchwork mural and the bricks almost hits the exact vertical center of the picture, disrupted by the person standing there. Her head is framed by the mural, and the lower half of her body is framed by the brick. Tonally, the mural is full of bold, bright shapes with diagonals and sharp edges, while the brick contrasts with its rhythmic rectangles and monochrome color scheme. I'd be curious to show this picture to some people and ask what their eye is drawn to first - for me, it's the person standing in the middle, because she's dark against the white bits of the mural.
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
suspense scene: director's reflection
NAME: Brenna Empey
DATE: 10/3/2016
FILM: Suspense Scene
DP: Jeff Hein
TMA 285
DIRECTOR’S REFLECTION
SUSPENSE SCENE
Overall response (2-3 paragraphs):
In 2-3 paragraphs,
write an overall response to your film: Were you successful at achieving what
you set out to achieve? What are you proud of? What would you do differently if
you could remake this piece? What did you learn?
The entire intent of this piece was
to create something that would contrast the typical “suspense” scene – a scene
that evokes feelings of fear, and generally is frightening or bad. I think
suspense scenes work well if they have a twist at the end, though, or something
that nobody expected. With all that in mind, I decided to make a scene with
comical suspense rather than fearful suspense, and a story that was ambiguous
enough to sell a lighthearted twist at the end. I think in that regard, my film
was successful – I added music that fulfilled the comedy aspect, and dissipated
tension that could’ve very easily overwhelmed the film. The twist at the end
wasn’t as much of a surprise as I wanted it to be, but I think it was a nice
conclusion to the comedic tension nonetheless. I can say I’m pretty proud of
the story, although I did run into some obstacles during shooting, editing, and
screening the film.
If I could do anything differently,
the first thing would definitely be to keep the lighting consistent. A lot of
the motivation for my lighting didn’t make sense from shot to shot, especially
when we went from flat/tight space to wide/deep space for the “twist” at the
end. During the screening one of the biggest things mentioned by the audience
was the inconsistency of lighting, so I wish the DP and I had paid more
attention to that during shooting. Another thing I wish I’d done was add more
to the narrative arc; there wasn’t much for the characters to do, and there was
really only one point of tension. I learned that sometimes more is better, for
instance I originally had about twice the number of shots/beats, but when we
got to the location we discovered we had a time limit and hand to change a
couple things about the shot list. I think the film would’ve worked better if
we hadn’t deleted so many shots.
Briefly answer the following:
What, specifically, did you want to communicate? Were you
successful? Why? Why not?
I think my main focus
was to create some situational irony in this piece, where what actually happens
to the characters is not what the audience anticipated. I knew that I would be
screening this film amongst more frightening and intense films, and I wanted to
contrast that by creating a situation where there’s tension but it’s relieved
in a comedic way. This was an interesting process because I originally only
wanted the audience to feel an ease of tension in the very end, but in the
editing room I decided to make the comedic elements come into play much earlier
than that. I think it worked well and actually made the twist at the end sell a
lot better because the audience already knew something quirky was going on, but
didn’t know exactly what it was until the very end.
How, specifically, did you try to say this? What visual
elements, techniques, etc. did you use?
There were several
ways I tried to communicate a gradual ease of tension – the idiosyncratic
props, the music, and the framing. For each character, I gave them a prop that
would sort of identify them and give them a visual to show their nervousness.
One character had a lighter that he was constantly flipping on and off, another
character had a watch she was constantly checking, and another character had a
knife she wasn’t sure what to do with. The music was a choice that actually
came in editing, but it works perfectly because it can either be perceived as
creepy or happy – and we shift between those two feelings within the film. One
moment, we’re feeling the tension and the music is adding another level of
creepiness, and as soon as the girl with the knife joins the other two hiders
behind the couch, the music becomes something comical. In the end, when the
surprise birthday party is revealed, the music becomes happy. Lastly, the
framing is really what created the tension in the film – I used a lot of flat
space and tight shots to trap the characters, and contrastingly I widened out
in the end to ease that tension.
What did you learn about storytelling:
I learned that you as
the filmmaking control the audience’s emotions. You can’t always tell them
exactly what to feel, but you can definitely put elements out there to try and make
them feel something, like fear. That was my intention; to create feelings of fear,
followed by comedic relief, and I think it worked pretty well. I also learned
that depending on how you frame things, how you light things, and where you
place the camera, you can make the audience either understand or misunderstand
what’s going on or where the characters are. I kept the space of this film
ambiguous, and thereby the situation of this film, ambiguous until the very end
which added to the comedic vibe.
Working with actors and getting performance:
I found this to be
pretty easy because all the actors I cast were my friends (don’t worry, they’re
actual actors too) so I found them easy to talk to and easy to direct. The nice
thing about this situation, too, is that my cast was interested in
collaborating and talking about ideas with me before the shot. They had a lot
of good suggestions, and took what I told them and made it their own. This was
definitely an easier directing process for me than the evoking childhood film,
firstly because this was a comedy, and secondly because I already had a
comfortable working relationship with my cast.
Blocking — camera and actors:
I really tried to
take advantage of what I know about visual and physical comedy in this piece.
There’s this moment where a girl walks in with a knife, and you think she’s
going to find and kill the people behind the couch, but in a successive shot she
joins them behind the couch, creating a three-shot. They’re completely calm and
it’s revealed that the audience’s fear had no merit; this murderous girl is a
friend of theirs. That’s when I think it really shifts to become a clearly
comedic piece, and a lot of the tension eases (hopefully for the audience too).
That’s one moment of comedy caused by blocking that I’m pretty proud of.
Visuals — composition, framing, visual elements:
I wanted the entire
film to have a trapped, constricted feel until the very end when it’s revealed
that these people are hiding to throw a surprise birthday party. For that
reason, I kept the space flat and the shots tight, which gave them a very small
and scary world to exist in. I think that worked well to heighten the tension
even though it was comedic tension. Then things widen out and become deeper
when it’s revealed that it’s been a birthday part the whole time, which eases
the trapped feeling. I do wish I’d made the spaces outside a little deeper to
contrast what was going on inside – it would’ve been pretty easy, too, since we
were filming a lot of streets with depth cues.
Design & Art Direction:
I don’t have much of
an art mind but I did want to have prominent props in this film, because it
would help to give each character complexity even though we’re only with them
for a brief amount of time. Those props ended up being a lighter, a watch, and
a knife – all three were associated with a certain character, giving them a
quirk that made them more interesting. I think that worked really well. If I
had had more money, I likely would’ve made the birthday decorations more
pronounced, just to add to the ridiculousness of the entire film. I especially
wish I’d been able to afford a colorful birthday cake instead of a carrot cake,
which was the cheapest cake I could find. Another thing I would go back and
change if I could is the use of practicals, which likely would’ve cleared up
any confusions about the lighting if I had paid more attention to what was
going on in that regard.
The Production Process — collaboration with crew, the
logistics of making this piece:
As I said before,
this was a pretty easy directing process because I was already friends with my
cast. It made it easier to collaborate and have discussions about upcoming
shots and emotions with them. Rather than me just telling them what to do, we
had conversations about what to do, which made the acting look more natural and
the directing process less intimidating for me. We were also very lucky to get
access to a location that worked perfectly for our needs, with a couch facing
the door and no wall behind it (this location was Taylor Davis’s house). Overall
the production process was really easy, especially when we started cutting
shots and made the shoot go even faster. One hiccup we did run into, at least
for me, was set dressing – birthday cakes aren’t cheap, but thankfully the
decorations are. I ended up buying a few decorations and, rather than spending
$12+ on a colorful birthday cake, I settled for a carrot cake. It looked find
but I wish it had been more colorful to read more blatantly as a birthday cake.
What was it like to watch your film with an audience? Did they
understand it? Miss the point? Why did they respond the way they did?
I think the response
to my film was pretty great! I feel like people laughed at all the right times
and felt fear/tension at the right times. The story is pretty straightforward
so I don’t think there was any confusion on the narrative end of things,
although some people did complain about not being able to see certain things –
that’s the fault of the projector, which darkens images and makes low-exposure
scenes pretty difficult to see. That’s something I need to keep in mind for the
future and maybe brighten my films a bit more than usual. I think I met my two
goals with the audience though: most people reacted positively, weren’t
confused, and thought it was funny without taking away from the suspense theme.
Other observations:
I tried to make the
lighting contrasty but not overwhelmingly so, but when we got to the screening
it was way too contrasty. This is something I need to pay attention to in the
future and make sure I don’t make the blacks too black, because a lot of information
about the image was lost on the audience. I also need to make sure that my
lighting makes sense in the future.
Tuesday, October 4, 2016
shot-for-shot part 1: analysis
NAME: Brenna Empey
DATE: 10/4/2016
DP: Jase
Van Meeteren
FILM 3: SHOT-FOR-SHOT
DUPLICATION
DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT
DIRECTOR’S STATEMENT OF INTENT
1.
What film or TV show
is this from?
Blade
Runner (1982,
Ridley Scott)
a. In 3-5 sentences, what has happened in the story before this scene?
Deckard
is an ex-police officer tasked with tracking and killing four replicants, which
are bioengineered humans that are illegal on Earth. His investigation leads him
to the Tyrell Corporation, a company that manufactures the type of replicant he’s
tracking down. It is there that he administers a “Voight-Kampff” test on Tyrell’s
assistant Rachael – the test is meant to test if a being is human or replicant,
and he discovers that she is a replicant who believes she is human. After a bit
more investigation and some run-ins with rogue replicants, Rachael comes to Deckard’s
apartment to try and prove that she really is human.
2.
What is the theme of
this film?
I
would say the theme of Blade Runner is
how consciousness, morality and empathy constitute humanness. A lot of the
events in this movie are there to prove that replicants can both be good and
evil, just like humans. Replicants can have empathy, and some have such strong
consciousness that they believe they are human, like Rachael and Deckard.
3.
What is the story—the
beginning, middle, and end—of your scene in three or four sentences? In other
words, what happens as the scene starts, as it progresses, and as it ends?
Rachael questions whether or not Deckard
believes she’s a replicant, and then tries to prove to him that she isn’t by
showing him an old family photo. To her disappointment and shock, he begins
reiterating detailed memories from her past, saying that they’re implanted and
belong to someone else – specifically, Tyrell’s niece. She becomes distressed and
emotional as she realizes he may be right, and she discards the photo before
briskly leaving his apartment.
4. What, specifically, must the audience understand
narratively in order to engage in this scene? How does the director communicate
each piece of information?
I think the most important thing to
understand about these characters and this scene is that Deckard isn’t
heartless – his task in the narrative is to hunt and kill replicants, but he
isn’t a monster. He knows he’s hurting Rachael by saying her memories are
fabricated and that she’s a replicant, and once she shows signs of emotional distress,
he tries to backtrack and get her a drink to make up for it. Deckard isn’t
antagonistic even though he may appear that way in this scene. I think it’s
also important to understand that the director chose to give Rachael very human
emotions, making even the audience doubt that she’s a replicant.
5. What is the narrative, emotional and thematic purpose of
this scene in the larger story?
This scene is a huge plot point for
Deckard and Rachael’s relationship. Rachael isn’t scared of Deckard at the end of this, even though she knows he
knows that she’s a replicant. He isn’t going to hunt and kill her even though
her presence on Earth is technically illegal. It’s less about that and more
about the fact that they share an emotional connection – Deckard doesn’t want
to hurt her, but feels she has the right to know that her memories are
implanted. Even though Rachael is upset at the end of this scene, overall this
difficult interaction proves to strengthen their relationship and their trust
in each other, especially when Deckard realizes he’s a replicant.
6. What emotion do you think the director wanted the
audience to experience in this scene? Why? How did the director achieve this?
How do you intend to do this?
I think the director wants the
audience to feel empathy toward Rachael – having an identity crisis is a human
thing, albeit hers is a little different than the typical identity crisis.
Point is, the emotions she’s going through as Deckard reiterates her memories are
visible on her face and in her acting, and it’s hard to watch. She’s losing any
sense of anything she thought was true, and that’s a hopeless place to be. It’s
a place no one ever wants to find themselves. The cinematography aids this,
because as Rachael is becoming more and more distressed, the camera closes in and
the shots get tighter. Then, when Deckard is finished with the conversation,
the shots widen out – both Rachael and Deckard look very alone in the frame. I’ll
replicate the cinematography to create these emotions, and I hope I can get the
same sort of subtle but powerful emotions that Sean Young portrays as Rachael.
7.
What is the first
image of the scene? What is the final image of the scene? Why do you think the
director chose these specific images?
The
first image is Rachael, surrounded by darkness, only her face illuminated. She
questions whether or not Deckard really believes she’s a replicant. The last
image is Deckard surrounded by the same sort of darkness, only half of his face
illuminated. He’s just watched Rachael leave in distress and now feels very
alone. Filming these two characters in the same way at the opening and closing
of this scene feels very intentional – they’re both in dark places during this
scene, and experience difficult emotions of identity loss, confusion, guilt and
empathy. I think it’s also important to note that the opening shot of Rachael puts
her on the right third, while in Deckard’s closing frame, he’s on the left
third. Even though they aren’t in the same room anymore, it’s like they’re
still talking.
8. Why is this scene personal to you? What previous personal
experience(s) does it remind you of? Ask yourself, “Why do I need to make this scene?”
I think we all go through a sort of
identity crisis phase at some point in our lives, and I definitely experienced
that as a teenager when I was trying to figure a lot of things out about
myself. Obviously the gravity of Rachael’s identity crisis is more intense than
mine – she’s finding out she isn’t even human – but I find her distress and
emotion relatable here.
9.
Which specific visual elements (line, shape,
space, tone, color, rhythm, movement) do you notice the director is using to
purposefully communicate the emotion of the scene? What other elements is the
director using to evoke emotion? (Be specific! Don’t just say “art direction,”
although that’s a start, say, “scattered clothing on the bed, open closet
doors…” etc.)
One
thing this scene does really well is associate certain shapes and lines with
certain characters. Rachael’s clothing is inherently round and has soft edges,
like her billowing collar, and so does the style of her hair. All around, she
looks much “softer” than Deckard. This entire scene takes place in Deckard’s
apartment, which is full of harsh lines and shapes. The walls are covered in a
square design, and most of the furniture, shelves, and lighting have sharp
edges and 90-degree corners. For this reason, Rachael really stands out from
her surroundings. The gravity of the scene is also communicated in the lighting,
which is deliberately sourcey and high contrast. The characters’ eyes really
stand out from the background more than anything else, which is ironic because
their eyes make them the most human – and later in the film we discover that
Deckard is a replicant just as well as Rachael.
10.
What focal lengths
does the director appear to be using? Why?
He actually appears to be using wider
lenses for most of the shots, and I think this works well to orient the audience
in Deckard’s apartment. As the emotions heighten, especially with Rachael, the
lenses get longer and the shots get tighter – the audience feels just as
trapped as she does. When she’s finally defeated and realizes she’s probably a
replicant, the lenses get very wide, even to 14mm, communicating her loneliness
and hopelessness.
11. In a bulleted list, describe two or three potential
obstacles the filmmakers faced in creating a successful scene. How do you think
they overcame these?
·
One
thing that always gets me about Blade
Runner is the costuming. It’s just really incredible. This scene in
particular used Rachael’s costume to communicate something about her character –
as I’ve mentioned before, she really stands out against the harsh lines and
shapes of Deckard’s apartment because her clothing and hair have so many round
edges. The filmmakers had to be very conscious about exactly how she looked in
this scene, and exactly how Deckard looked as well, because they needed to
contrast each other.
·
I
didn’t expect this, but I think there were some obstacles with the writing of
this scene – particularly the dialogue. As I was searching for the Blade Runner shooting script, I kept running
across versions of the script where this scene was missing or very different.
It took me a while to find the right script. This makes me think that this was
a difficult interaction to approach, because it covers so many emotions and it’s
a huge moment of character development for both Rachael and Deckard. It just
goes to show that to get something right, sometimes you have to try a lot of
different things and different approaches, which is what I think happened with
this scene.
12.
In a bulleted list,
describe two or three potential obstacles you
may face in creating a successful scene. How can you be prepared to overcome
these? Be specific!
·
The
hardest thing for me, I think, will be finding a location. It’s one thing to
find a location with a big window – a pretty hard thing to come across when
most of your resources are college apartments – but it’s another thing to find
a location with such a uniquely-shaped kitchen. There is a lot of texture going
on in the location as well, which will be almost impossible to find and
difficult to replicate.
·
I’m
not much of a director so I think it’ll be difficult to pull such natural
emotions out of the actress I choose for Rachael. It’s one thing to show the
actress the scene from the actual movie before we shoot it – it’s another thing
to recreate those emotions and make them look natural. I think one way to
overcome this is to make sure I’m friends with the actress I cast, and I
already have a few ideas in mind.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)